The difference between the mortified, but still proud and self-centered stoic and the unmortified hedonist consists in this: the latter, being flabby, shiftless and at heart rather ashamed of himself, lacks the energy and the motive to do much harm except to his own body, mind and spirit; the former, because he has all the secondary virtues and looks down on those who are not like himself, is morally equipped to wish and to be able to do harm on the very largest scale and with a perfectly untroubled conscience. These are obvious facts; and yet, in the current religious jargon of our day the word “immoral” is reserved almost exclusively for the carnally self-indulgent. The covetous and the ambitious, the respectable toughs and those who cloak their lust for power and place under the right sort of idealistic cant, are not merely unblamed; they are even held up as models of virtue and godliness. The representatives of the organized churches begin by putting haloes on the heads of the people who do most to make wars and revolutions, then go on, rather plaintively, to wonder why the world should be in such a mess.
— Aldous Huxley, The Perennial Philosophy
Categories
Random Posts
- Farewell to FacebookI think I will 1) stop writing and reading on FB altogether, and only post to it from my blog, 2) communicate directly with people …
- Speech Between the Fallen – a cywyyd deuair hyrionMust I explain it once more? Try hard to fight the boredom that most likely will ensue the moment you think useless any viewpoint but …
- There Is No MundaneThe clock will stop that human hands must wind; its mechanized contrivances will fail, and in those precious seconds between time the boundary between the …
- Farewell to Facebook
Recent Comments
- Irene on Some ancient affirmations
- Rekha on No More Sad Weepings of Regret
- Novena on Wake Up: sonetto rispetto
- John on On the Veranda: serenade
Subscribe
Join 298 other subscribersMeta